That kind of makes Strong Agnostics and Humanists the same then?
Not really. I'd say that Humanism and Strong Agnosticism are compatible, but certainly not identical.
"Humanism is a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism). The meaning of the term humanism has fluctuated, according to the successive intellectual movements which have identified with it. Generally, however, humanism refers to a perspective that affirms some notion of a "human nature" (sometimes contrasted with antihumanism).
In modern times, humanist movements are typically aligned with secularism and with non-theistic religions. Historically however, this was not always the case."
Essentially, Humanism says nothing about the existence of gods, goddesses or so-called "supernatural" beings at all, but as the Wikipedia article says it simply values evidence over faith - which makes it equally compatible with such non-theistic religions as Unitarianism and Buddhism, with probably most variations of Paganism, with all shades of agnosticism and with outright atheism; but certainly incompatible with any kind of fundamentalist or absolutist religions.
A case could be made that, since many philosophers seem to have equated Humanism with philanthropy (scroll down through the Wiki article), Humanism is in fact a rather complicated and convoluted way of urging people to be kind to each other!
Blessed Be everyone,